The Physical Trust Layer

The technology powering
art market compliance

From a smartphone photograph to a blockchain-anchored, AML-scored digital passport. Five integrated technology layers designed for institutional use and built to meet EU, US, and UK regulatory requirements. Additional IP protection through 20 patent claims filed.

Visual DNA Provenance AML Scoring NFC Binding Blockchain SOC 2 & GDPR Research

Layer 1 — Visual Identity

MIRAS Visual DNA™

Every artwork has a unique physical surface — micro-variations in brushstrokes, canvas weave, pigment texture, and craquelure that are as distinctive as a human fingerprint. MIRAS captures this identity from two photographs (front + back) taken with a standard smartphone.

The front image is processed by a DINOv2 self-supervised vision transformer that produces a 384-dimensional visual fingerprint — a compact vector capturing micro-features invisible to the human eye. The back image documents provenance markers (gallery labels, stamps, inventory numbers). Together they produce a SHA-256 cryptographic digest — the Visual DNA — which is non-reversible, non-forgeable, and can be re-verified at any time by re-photographing the artwork.

A high-quality print or reproduction fails verification because it cannot replicate the physical micro-texture of the original surface.

IP protected · UIBM #102026000009442 · 10 claims

Visual DNA Engine

DINOv2
Vision Transformer (ViT-S/14)
FAISS
Vector Similarity Search
SHA-256
Cryptographic Digest
2 Photos
Front (fingerprint) + Back (provenance)
<0.01%
False Positive Rate
<2s
Matching Latency
384-dim
Fingerprint Vector

Automated Research

Provenance Intelligence

MIRAS doesn't just store provenance — it actively researches it. The system queries 10+ external databases via API, calculates a Provenance Completeness Index (PCI), and flags gaps automatically.

Historical Risk Windows are pre-configured: Nazi looting (1933–1945), Eastern European confiscations (1949–1990), Russian revolution (1917–1922), UNESCO cultural property (post-1970), Cuban confiscations (1953–1959). Any ownership gap during these periods triggers an automatic flag.

The system is intellectually honest: it never claims 100% provenance where it doesn't exist. Instead, it quantifies exactly what is documented and what remains unknown.

Automated Database Checks

Art Loss RegisterStolen art (€8/check)
InterpolStolen Works DB (free)
ICOM Red ListsCultural heritage
Carabinieri TPCItalian cultural police
OFAC SDNUS sanctions (free)
EU SanctionsConsolidated list (free)
OpenSanctionsGlobal PEP/sanctions
Artnet / ArtpriceAuction comparables
National RegistersCultural heritage
10+
Data Sources
PCI
Completeness Index

Layer 5 — Risk Intelligence

AML Risk Scoring Engine

The industry's first computational AML risk model for art transactions. Two independent scoring engines analyse 15 risk variables with 7 contextual modifiers, producing a composite score (0–100) mapped to four risk bands.

The Asset & Context Risk Score (ARS) uniquely integrates data from the authentication layer — Visual DNA verification status, NFC authentication, and blockchain integrity — creating a cross-layer anomaly detection capability that no partnership of separate tools can replicate.

For scores above 55 (Red), the system auto-generates a Suspicious Transaction Report in goAML format (UNODC standard), ready for submission to any Financial Intelligence Unit.

IP protected · UIBM #102026000010327 · 10 claims

Two Scoring Engines

CRS — Client
6 variables
ARS — Asset & Context
9 variables
Modifiers
7 contextual
GREEN
0–15
YELLOW
16–35
ORANGE
36–55
RED
56–100
15
Risk Variables
7
Modifiers

Layer 2 — Physical Security

NFC Physical Binding

An NXP NTAG 424 DNA chip with AES-128 encryption is physically bound to the artwork. Each tap generates a unique, non-replayable cryptographic message (SUN/CMAC protocol) with a monotonically increasing counter.

The tag stores the SHA-256 digest of the Visual DNA, creating a bidirectional cryptographic link: the tag proves it belongs to this artwork, and the artwork proves it belongs to this tag.

Tamper-evident adhesive and a TagTamper wire loop detect any removal attempt. If the tag is compromised, the Visual DNA remains the source of truth — the artwork is always identifiable without the tag.

Trap Mode: A stolen NFC tag on a fake artwork triggers instant Visual DNA mismatch — and continues logging GPS, timestamp, and device data for law enforcement.

IP protected · 10 claims

NFC Security Features

Chip
NXP NTAG 424 DNA
Encryption
AES-128
Protocol
SUN / CMAC
Anti-tamper
Wire loop + adhesive
0
Cloneable
Tap lifespan

Layer 3 — Immutable Record

Dual-Layer Blockchain

MIRAS resolves the tension between data confidentiality (GDPR) and regulatory auditability using a dual-layer architecture.

Private layer (Hyperledger Fabric): stores confidential records — personal data, transaction details, full provenance chain — with Role-Based Access Control. Supports GDPR Art. 17 right to erasure.

Public layer (Ethereum L2 / Polygon): stores only irreversible hashes and ERC-721 tokens. Any third party can verify the integrity of a record without accessing confidential data.

An Independent Audit Node verifies every anchor — third parties don't need to trust MIRAS to verify proof.

IP protected · 10 claims

Architecture

Private
Hyperledger Fabric
Public
Polygon ERC-721
Token
Non-fungible (NFT)
Hash
SHA-256
5+
Year retention (Basel VII)
GDPR
Art. 17 compliant

Security & Compliance

SOC 2, GDPR & EU AI Act

SOC 2 Type I certification targeted for Year 1. Penetration tested before launch. Infrastructure hosted on AWS multi-region EU (Frankfurt primary, Ireland secondary) for GDPR data residency.

GDPR by architecture: personal data encrypted in Data Vault (AES-256 + RBAC). Blockchain stores only irreversible hashes. Right to erasure without compromising audit trail integrity.

EU AI Act (Art. 13, 14): every risk score includes a Risk Decomposition Report with top-5 contributing variables and natural language explanation. Human-in-the-loop mandatory for Orange and Red decisions.

Regulatory coverage: AMLR 2024/1624 (EU), 6AMLD (EU), Art Market Integrity Act S.2400 (US), HMRC MLR 2017 (UK), Basel AML Principles, RAM Toolkit.

Compliance Stack

Audit
SOC 2 Type I (Y1)
Data
GDPR Art. 17
AI
EU AI Act Art. 13-14
AML
AMLR + 6AMLD + AMIA
Hosting
AWS EU (Frankfurt)
Encryption
AES-256 + RBAC

Peer-Reviewed

SSRN Working Paper · 2026

Cross-Layer Anomaly Detection for AML Compliance in the Art Market: A Multi-Engine Scoring Framework

Tullio Angheben (MIRAS.ART — MARGIN International LLC), Margherita Angheben & Ginevra Angheben (CBS International Business School)

The paper introduces a computational framework purpose-built for anti-money laundering compliance in the art market. The system employs two independent scoring engines comprising 15 proprietary variables and 7 contextual modifiers. Using weighted aggregation with dynamic context-sensitive parameters, it produces composite risk scores that enable compliance with EU Regulation 2024/1624 with computational precision rather than subjective judgment.

Read the full paper on SSRN →

Paper Metrics

15
Risk Variables
2
Scoring Engines
7
Modifiers
22
Feature Space
SSRN Paper #6584859

The compliance infrastructure the
art market has been waiting for.

AMLR 2027 is coming. The institutions that move first will set the standard. Technology is the enabler — being the institutional standard is the moat.

Request Early Access →